What concern should be raised about implementing an allow list for websites in an organization?

Implementing an allow list for websites in an organization does indeed require significant time and resources to maintain. This is because the process involves continuously monitoring, evaluating, and updating the list to ensure that it is current and relevant. As new websites and applications emerge that may be beneficial for employees, IT staff must regularly assess whether these should be added to the allow list. Additionally, if employees request access to specific websites that are not on the list, IT must evaluate those requests on a case-by-case basis, further adding to the administrative burden. This ongoing maintenance can become quite labor-intensive, especially in a dynamic digital environment where website relevance can change rapidly.

The other options presented, while they may have some relation to allow lists, do not accurately reflect the primary concern associated with their implementation. For instance, the notion that an allow list would increase internet speed is misleading, as it primarily governs accessibility rather than performance. Similarly, while limiting website access could potentially impact productivity, the main issue highlighted here is the ongoing maintenance demands associated with managing the allow list. Lastly, the statement regarding users easily bypassing the allow list, while a possible concern, does not account for the structured control and monitoring that an organization would implement to minimize such risks. Thus, the